Revisiting Modernity and Reality in Deleuze's Taxonomy of Cinema Ka-Fai Yau's essay Recon-figuration: Revisiting Modernity and Reality in Deleuze's Taxonomy of Cinema begins by pondering the famous Sontag statement on Balzac, that "everyone knows, primitive people fear that the camera will rob them of some part of their being." In the age of film, this fear has been heightened because of the facility in which the image can be manipulated to suit the purpose of the person behind the camera. Indeed, Yau refers to the altered sense of reality in Cinema as the "paradox of moulding." That is to say that film has the almost magical ability to "bring forth" reality while at the same time omit essential parts of it. According to Yau, Gilles Deleuze's Cinema Project describes in great detail the "disembodying processes" involved in the paradox of moulding, and specifically how Deleuze shows that Cinema is a mechanism within the process, not a process in itself. Yau formulates his argument by focusing on particular era in the history of Cinema where artistic shifts occured, such as 1948 Italy. His discussion of Italian cinema, particularly neorealism, Yau focuses on how the "reality" in neorealism is a focused and deliberate depiction. According to Yau, "The real in neo-realism is no longer just concerned about the affinity between the frame and the audience. It is also concerned with the affinity between the frame and the external world" that contributes to the paradox of moulding. In other words, reality is never limited to what is seen in the mise-en-scene. To illustrate this, Yau looks at Bicycle Thieves and its subtle manipulation of causal reality. What Yau determines is that de Sica's film creates a space of where reality exists in an ambiguous space. Indeed, what seems like a simple story of a man looking for a bike is actually a carefully orchestrated depiction of life where reality becomes spectacle.
tagged Bicycle_Thieves Cinema Neorealism Sontag de_sica by colliert ...on 28-JUL-06
tagged Bicycle_Thieves Cinema Italian Neorealism by colliert ...and 12 other people ...on 09-JUN-06
tagged Bazin Bicycle_Thieves Cinema Italian Neorealism by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1993.5.I88 M28 1986
In the preface to the book Italian film in the light of neorealism, Millicent Marcus includes an enlightening quote from Vittorio de Sica on the effects of the war on Cinema. de Sica states that everyone involved in Italian cinema post-war felf the need to "liberate ourselves from the weight of our sins, we wanted to look ourselves in the face and tell ourselves the truth, to discover what we really were, and to seek salvation." With this quote, Marcus sets the tone for what the book is ultimately about, which is linking neorealism to a new identity not just for Italian filmmakers, but for the nation as a whole. The contributions of de Sica to this movement are likened to a stone that "contributed to the moral reconstruction of" Italy, specifically Italian thought. Consquently, Marcus makes the argument that neorealism proper goes on to beget a more personalized form of realism that contributes to a culture shift that influences filmmakers as diverse as Bertolucci and Wertmuller.
The one film that Marcus singles out one film as the premier moment of neorealism as a whole is of course Bicycle Thief, although it should be noted that Rossellini's Rome, Open City is given the distinction of being the founding of neorealism proper. What sets Bicycle Thief apart for Marcus is the way that de Sica/Zavattini's work focused on the "banality of the stabilized postwar condition." One line in particular ("No, nothing, just a bicycle") resonates with Marcus because it shows the total dismissal by the powers that be of the loss that Antonio faces in having his bicycle stolen. The space that is created by de Sica is described as being "fragmented, decentered" and having no sense of cohesion which creates a maze like atmosphere for Antonio as he looks for the bicycle. This sense of endless, fruitless searching is summed up by Marcus as an inherent pessimism on the part of de Sica that is meant to be a reflection of the disappointment of the Italian people as a whole.
tagged Cinema Neorealism de_sica by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
tagged Cinema Neorealism bicycle_thief de_sica by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
> 
Shiel, Mark. . Italian neorealism : rebuilding the cinematic city / Mark Shiel. [1904764487 ] London ; New York : Wallflower Press, 2006.
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1993.5.I88 S55 2006
< With Italian Neorealism: Rebuilding the cinematic city, Mark Shiel creates a compact, yet thorough introduction to the rich history of mid-20th century Italian cinema, also known as the age of neorealism. Like many works that focuse on Italian neorealism, Shiel chooses to highlight the dichotomous relationship between two films: Roberto Rossellini's Rome, Open City (1945) and Vittorio de Sica's Bicycle Thieves. Shiel argues that the most groundbreaking legacy of de Sica's masterwork is his and his frequent collaborator Cesare Zavattini, "merger of metaphysical and political concerns." This merger stood in sharp contrast to Rome, Open City, which contained an explicit depiction of Catholicism. According to Shiel, an indictment of Italian society that focused on religiosity was deemed to limiting for de Sica and Zavattini. Indeed, Zavattini was known for looking for ways to promote social justice from a humanist perspective to combat "ignorance, alienation, injustice, and poverty" (54).
< In his discussion of Bicycle Thieves, Shiel details how de Sica and Zavattini create an authentic milieu of Italian society in the 1940's by focusing the lens on a protagonist that is, in a word "typical" (55). In Antonio Ricci, a man who is simply attempting to maintain a decent quality of life for him and his son Bruno in the midst of the devastating poverty and unemploymnet that occurred post-war. The film's depiction of the search for the bike follows, according to Shiel, the "classical narrative structure, active characterisation, and narrative closure" that was found in more mainstream motion pictures, but there was also a commitment to showing so called "life as it is," not the prevalent idealism, and in some cases, censorship that occured in Fascist Italy and throughout Europe in other places known for cinema like Franco's Spain and Nazi Germany.
tagged Bicycle_Thieves Cinema Italian Neorealism de_sica by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
Verdone,M . "The Italian Cinema from Its Beginnings to Today" Hollywood quarterly [1549-0076] 5.3 (1951). 270-.tagged Bicycle_Thieves Cinema Italian Neorealism by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
Tomasulo,FP . "" Bicycle Thieves": A Re-Reading" Cinema journal [0009-7101] 21.2 (1982). 2-.
http://www.jstor.org/view/00097101/ap040032/04a00020/0
What reality is Vittorio de Sica's Bicycle Thieves conveying? That is the question that Tomasulo's polemical essay "Bicycle Thieves: A Re-Reading" (1982) attempts to answer. Tomasulo argues that although there are unquestionable links between neorealism and its social/historical moment, Bicycle Thieves does not accurately portray the social forces that create the situation for Antonio and Bruno. In his Marxist influenced critque of de Sica's film, Tomasulo charges that "at best, the film is reformist; at worst, it legitimizes the ideology of bourgeois liberalism." Also disputed by Tomasulo is Bazin's assertion that the Bicycle Thieves is a break from the classical narrative by pointing out that the film does indeed follow an organized plot structure.
Unlike Shiel, who asserts that Bicycle Thieves is a humanist work, Tomasulo makes the claim that the film convey's "a quasi-mystical aura of Christian brotherhood," by pointing to the scene in the film which takes place at a charity ward because traditionally these institutions were associated with the Vatican. Ultimately, it is a sense of religiosity that makes the film's perceived solidarity with the poor, ring inauthentic to Tomasulo.
tagged Bicycle_Thieves Cinema Italian Neorealism by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
Keating,P . "The Fictional Worlds of Neorealism." Criticism [0011-1589] 45.1 (2003). 11-.
Unlike Yau's Recon-figuration:Revisiting Modernity and Reality in Deleuze's Taxonomy of Cinema (Wide angle [0160-6840] 20.4 (1998). 51-.) Patrick Keating disputes previous claims that Neorealism exist solely in a plane of constructed reality because of conventional cinematic attributes . Keating does not refute that neorealism is constructed and stylized reality, but it is his assertion that neorealism is closely related to documentary in its scope and tradition as well. To support his claims, Keating points to Benjamin Harshav's theory of Internal and External Fields of Reference, a literary theory that explains how a work of fiction does not truly exist outside of reality, but rather the realms of fiction and reality are interrelated through a frame of reference (fr). Each frame does not exist in a separate world, but rather inhabits and contributes to a larger frame, called a field.
In the Bicycle Thieves, Keating sees a "double-decker" reference of reality where there is the fictionalized Rome that de Sica constructs (internal), and the Rome outside of the mise en scene (external). In other words, a viewer is getting a glimpse into the world of Antonio and Bruno AND late 40's post-war Italy. These two references do not exist in separate spheres, yet they are distinct and should not be interpreted as being one in the same, but the viewer still is shaped by the depiction of father and son shown in the film. The reality in the Bicycle Thieves is not based solely on content, but rather the importation of reality to the film and the subsequent exportation of this reality as art.
tagged Bicycle_Thieves Cinema Neorealism de_sica documentary by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1993.5.I88 R45 2002
tagged Cinema Italian Neorealism by colliert ...on 09-JUN-06
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1998.3.D42 C37 2002
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1998.3.T78 A4 1990
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1993.5.F7 H39 2005
Call#: Van Pelt Library D1 .J58



