<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/mkuruc/20th_century_fox+zanuck</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /mkuruc/20th_century_fox+zanuck</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/1823</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/1823</link>
<title>Hitchcock and Selznick : the rich and strange collaboration of Alfred Hitchcock and David O. Selznick in Hollywood / Leonard J. Leff.</title>
<description>&lt;a href="http://tags.library.upenn.edu/mkuruc/20th_century_fox" /&gt; &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;By 1941, Hitchcock was considered by pop culture to be in the same league as Frank Capra and Orson Welles as being a recognizable personality as well as filmmaker.&amp;nbsp; Hitchcock had begun to receive some autonomy on his films of this periods from studios like RKO (who also afforded the same courtesy to Welles).&amp;nbsp; However, while Welles&amp;rsquo;s autonomy came contractually, Hitchcock&amp;rsquo;s came from people&amp;rsquo;s dislike of confrontation with the standoffish director.&amp;nbsp; With RKO unsatisfied with the progress of one of his projects, they began to seek more direct involvement.&amp;nbsp; Hitchock responded by leaving the studio after the projects completion, with David O. Selznick helping him work out a deal with 20&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; Century Fox.&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Unused to and unaccepting of studio interference, Hitchcock&amp;rsquo;s brief stint at 20&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; Century Fox saw Hitchcock having to deal with studio head Zanuck over many of the elements of production.&amp;nbsp; Zanuck&amp;rsquo;s biggest issue with Hitchcock was his slow production pace.&amp;nbsp; It took twenty weeks for a script for Lifeboat to be produced.&amp;nbsp; A short production schedule was imposed on Hitchcock which was ignored.&amp;nbsp; Zanuck constantly sent letters complaining of the inefficiency of Hitchcock&amp;rsquo;s shooting scenes in sequential order and wanted cuts to be made to keep the project under budget, with Hitchcock frequently never responding.&amp;nbsp; Hitchcock disliked the even stronger studio interference then in his earlier projects, and Zanuck disliked Hitchcock&amp;rsquo;s disregard for the budget.&amp;nbsp; With Hitchcock&amp;rsquo;s value to the studio questionable, a second film for Fox was not produced (as originally intended).&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Leff also notes that although Hitchcock sought after Steinbeck, he still hesitated working with &lt;em&gt;The Grapes of Wrath&lt;/em&gt; author.&amp;nbsp; Familiar with Steinbeck&amp;rsquo;s work, Hitchcock was afraid of the &amp;ldquo;political baggage&amp;rdquo; that would be brought to the film that was meant to be a technical challenge above all.&amp;nbsp; Ironically, Steinbeck&amp;rsquo;s original work was far less politically controversial then Hitchcock&amp;rsquo;s eventual film.&amp;nbsp; Even in interviews after filming, Hitchcock denies any reading of the film other then a political one.&amp;nbsp; Leff states this as being the film&amp;rsquo;s chief weakness.&amp;nbsp; Instead of focusing on the development of real characters, Hitchcock is more concerned with the allegory of political ideal and ideals colliding.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
