http://tags.library.upenn.edu/project/18367 PennTags Feed http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18367 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18367 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18255 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18255 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18243 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18243 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18579 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18579 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18261 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18261 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18286 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18286 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18578 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18578 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18561 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18561 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18343 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/18343 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/31129 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/31129 <p>Foreword to colloquium special issue on The Boundaries of Liberty after Lawrence v. Texas. Compares Lawrence to Loving v. Virginia. Lawrence resembles Loving in important ways. Like Loving, Lawrence marks a crystallization of doctrine. ... Just as&nbsp; Loving was a case about inequality that informed the jurisprudence of liberty, Lawrence is a case about liberty that has important implications for the jurisprudence of equality. In fact, liberty and equality are more intertwined in Lawrence than in Loving. The Loving Court could have rested its decision entirely on the unconstitutionality of racial subordination without looking at all at the importance of marriage; by contrast, the Lawrence Court's discussion of liberty would be incoherent without some underlying commitment to equality among groups. The Warren Court often espoused "substantive" equal protection; the Lawrence Court attacked a "suspect" deprivation of liberty.Lawrence relates to Loving in yet another important way. Loving drew a clear distinction between rationality review and heightened scrutiny. Lawrence, by contrast, sidesteps this conventional doctrinal framework. ... Lawrence, however, does to due process analysis something very similar to what the Court's previous gay-rights decision, Romer v. Evans, did to equal protection analysis: it undermines the traditional tiers of scrutiny altogether.</p>