<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/Intellectual_Property+authority</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/Intellectual_Property+authority</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/40663</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/40663</link>
<title>Quotation and modern American poetry : imaginary gardens with real toads / by Elizabeth Gregory.</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Gregory, Janice.&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;Quotation and Modern American Poetry&lt;/em&gt;: &lt;em&gt;"Imaginary Gardens with Real &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Toads&lt;/em&gt;."&amp;nbsp; Houston, TX: Rice UP, 1996.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gregory's study compares the poetics of quotation in T.S. Eliot, William Carlos Williams, and Marianne Moore.&amp;nbsp; Quotation, she argues, either draws on the authority of what a writer quotes or parodies that same authority.&amp;nbsp; She identifies four pre-Modernist conceptions of the function of quotation, each allied with a different epoch: Christian antiquity and the medieval, Renaissance, and Romantic periods.&amp;nbsp; Apostolic and Pauline texts quote Jesus and the Old Testament to invoke the awe of revelation, the binding force of law, and to establish their own authority.&amp;nbsp; Medieval writers invoke the same authority from non-Christian authors, especially Aristotle.&amp;nbsp; The Renaissance, through figures like Erasmus and Cervantes, instigates the double character of quotation, useful for authorization and parody.&amp;nbsp; The Romantic period witnesses the rise of a discourse of originality that created immense anxiety in poets like Coleridge and Wordsworth over their belatedness in relation to great poets like Milton.&amp;nbsp; Their rare instances of quotation are in the service of transferring authority to modern, secular forces.&amp;nbsp; Setting this anxiety in an American context, Emerson insists in the 1830s that originality and quotation are not mutually exclusive, thus setting the stage for poetry that acknowledges a great debt to tradition but nevertheless seeks to establish an original relation to the universe.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gregory argues that Eliot, Williams, and Moore all employ quotation to explore the way authority is gendered, particularly with reference to America's belatedness in secular history.&amp;nbsp; Borrowing on the work of Marie Borroff, Gregory demonstrates how Moore's inclusion of "promotional prose" and the text from park monuments, intimate conversations, volumes of natural history, and other non-canonical language alongside quotations from Yeats and allusions to Browning throws into question the hierarchies on which the authority of quotation rests.&amp;nbsp; These "unauthoritative" texts enter the realm of literature for multiple purposes, among them revaluation, modest depersonalization, and the establishment maternal authority.&amp;nbsp; Gregory also suggests that Moore's practice of quotation influenced T.S. Eliot, not the other way around, by convincing him that he could fashion poetry "out of a refusal to digest the fragments of the texts that inspired it."&amp;nbsp; Gregory allows me to argue that Moore's practice of quotation serves several of the analogous functions that sampling serves in music, and subsequently that there might be a causal relationship between Moore's nationality and the views she held on quotation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
