<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/Media+sentryriaa</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/Media+sentryriaa</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35565</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35565</link>
<title>Sony BMB Music v. Tenenbaum Deposition</title>
<description>&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%;"&gt;The Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum case is arguably the most high profile file-sharing case in the news today for a number of reasons.  First, the defendant, Tenenbaum, is being represented by a famous Harvard Law professor by the name of Charles Neeson.  The fact that Neeson was attracted to this case speaks volumes of the potential change to be made in how copyright law runs in the modern world today.  Second, this case shows to the common people the true motive of the RIAA.  They are trying to make an example out of Tenenbaum, who downloaded seven songs, in order to intimidate everyone from sharing files on their computer.  He is a small fish in a big pond to them, and they think that they can use the intimidation tactic of suing him for an exorbitant amount of money all the while instilling fear in those who are thinking of sharing files.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%;"&gt;This leads to the reason why I am choosing to use this case as a source: Tenenbaum is not trying to win his case just so the RIAA can pay legal fees that incurred, rather he wants to tackle the organization's legal strategy at its core.  He is trying to prove the unconstitutionality of their litigation tactics in order to severely limit their power and effectively hit them where it hurts.  Someone is finally accusing them of abusing the law and constitutional rights, and has the legal team to back him as well.  There is a major difference between reading court cases and reading the obvious abuse by the RIAA in them, and actually being proactive and trying to defend yourself and others.  The people have had enough with the RIAA and their monopoly over copyright law in regards to file-sharing and the music industry and the measures they take to restrict the flow of information that copyright is supposed to encourage.  People are not supposed to be so scared of the RIAA that they will not use the computer or send files ever again for fear of punishment.  The modern world we live in is changing largely into a digital world, and the RIAA is trying to stop us from moving forward by squashing our hunger for new information with their unconstitutional strategies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 200%;"&gt;This source is a blog written by one of Prof. Neeson's students in his CyberOne class, who are also helping out Tenenbaum in his legal battle.  This source also provides links to the portions of the court case documents themselves which could potentially be very helpful in my paper if I need to locate something specific in the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
