<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/case+day+perfect+search</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/case+day+perfect+search</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35223</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35223</link>
<title>Hotaling v. LDS Church</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt; Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt; &lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;
&lt;style&gt;
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-qformat:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin-top:0in;
	mso-para-margin-right:0in;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	mso-para-margin-left:0in;
	line-height:115%;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The Hotaling v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints case is important because it helps distinguish Google's use of thumbnails with cases that are actually not Fair Use.&amp;nbsp; In this case, Hotaling, a group of researchers, compiled and copyrighted a number of genealogical research materials.&amp;nbsp; At some point, the Church of Latter-Day Saints received one legitimate copy of the microfiche and added it to its main library's collection in Salt Lake City, Utah.&amp;nbsp; Later, they made microfiche copies of the works without the Hotalings' permission and sent the copies to several of its branch libraries.&amp;nbsp; There were many extenuating circumstances, but even with them the appellate court decided that this was copyright infringement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This is especially relevant because Perfect 10 attempted to cite this case as part of their argument.&amp;nbsp; "Perfect 10 incorrectly relies on &lt;em&gt;Hotaling v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;em&gt;Napster &lt;/em&gt;for the proposition that merely making images "available" violates the copyright owner's distribution right."(Perfect 10 v. Google)&amp;nbsp; The Hotaling case differs significantly from the Google case.&amp;nbsp; Hotaling made exact copies and distributed them to places that would otherwise have had to buy the copies.&amp;nbsp; The infringement in this case was much more direct and obvious than what Perfect 10 accuses Google of doing with their thumbnails.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Regardless, this case demonstrates an important difference between Google and the average Fair Use case.&amp;nbsp; Google is not distributing copies; they are creating thumbnails from other sites.&amp;nbsp; Google is not creating these images entirely, nor are they distributing the images.&amp;nbsp; Since merely making images "available" has been shown to not be enough for copyright infringement in the Hotaling case, we can carry that over to the Google case.&amp;nbsp; This completely nullifies one of Perfect 10's arguments, even according to the Court, than this case is very essential to supporting my thesis.&amp;nbsp; It both supports my thesis by both contrasting Google with the Hotaling case and establishing a precedent which takes away one of the opposing viewpoint's arguments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
