PennTags Feed for /tag/city_planning+accessibility

Metropolitan Accessibility and Transportation Sustainability

Metropolitan Accessibility and Transportation Sustainability:

Comparative Indicators for Policy Reform
University of Michigan and University of Maryland

A project of the Collaborative Science and Technology Network for Sustainability of the Environmental Protection Agency
and the Graham Environmental Sustainability Institute

Levine - Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance

Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance

Jonathan Levine. American Planning Association. Journal of the American Planning Association. Chicago: Spring 1998. Vol. 64, Iss. 2; pg. 133, 17 pgs

Abstract (Summary)

Through estimation of a discrete choice model of residential location, this study argues that commute time remains a dominant determinant of residential location at the regional scale, and that provision of affordable housing near employment concentrations can influence residential location decisions for low-to-moderate-income, single-worker households. However, the significance of jobs-hunting balance is not in reducing congestion; even when successful, such policies will have little impact on average travel speeds. Rather, the relaxation of suburban regulation that could lead to improved matches between home and workplace is seen as enhancing the range of households' choices about residence and transportation.

Lucas - Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK

Title: Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK

Source: Transportation research. Part B, Methodological [0191-2615] Lucas yr:2006 vol:40 iss:10 pg:801

Abstract

This paper examines emerging trends in transport policy in the UK, as identified by the 2004 Transport White Paper and the supporting policy guidance to local transport authorities for addressing social exclusion through local transport provision; accessibility planning. It moves on to identify potential barriers to delivery at the local level and more fundamental challenges, risks and policy tensions. In this context, it critiques UK policies to deliver social equity through transport programmes in light of its Climate Change Agenda and the identified need to significantly reduce traffic levels on UK roads.

It identifies the potential synergy between these two policy ambitions, but argues that currently there is a serious policy conflict between these agendas within the UK policy framework. In the light of this conclusion, it offers some key recommendations on the best way forward, which it recommends must be based on the synergistic and integrated delivery of policies for social and environmental equity within the transport sector. It concludes by identifying the key challenges this implies for applied research in this area.