<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/city_planning+editorial</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/city_planning+editorial</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/19197</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/19197</link>
<title>Sustainability: Planning's Redemption or Curse? | Planetizen</title>
<description>Sustainability: Planning's Redemption or Curse?&lt;p&gt;8 February 2007 - 8:This editorial is based on an article that was originally published in the Journal of Planning Education and Research (JPER), Vol. 26, No. 2 (208-221). The full article is available online at Sage Publications.00am&lt;br /&gt;Author: Michael Gunder, PhD&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sustainability is often defined as a balance of the three E's: the environment, the economy, and social equity. But as planners embrace the concept, the sustainability &amp;quot;balance&amp;quot; heavily favors one E: the economy. Michael Gunder warns that planners risk sacrificing the environment and social equity in the name of sustainable economic development.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
