<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/modernism+lyric</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/modernism+lyric</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/40710</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/40710</link>
<title>Changing voices : the modern quoting poem / Leonard Diepeveen.</title>
<description>&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Diepreveen, Leonard.&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;Changing Voices: The Modern Quoting Poem&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Ann Arbor, MI: U of Michigan Press, 1993.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;From the perspective of a scholar of&amp;nbsp;twentieth-century American poetry, Diepreveen sees his project as an intervention in a discourse of "citationality" that he&amp;nbsp;believes has come to stand in for any type of intertextuality, whether allusion, quotation, or formal citation.&amp;nbsp; Allusion and quotation are too different to be considered under the same concept, given how indirect an allusion may be and still qualify as an illusion.&amp;nbsp; Though he grants that the assumption of appropriated materials characterizes a great deal of formally innovative twentieth-century art, he restricts the scope of his study to poetry.&amp;nbsp; He aims, through practical criticism, to consider the impact that quotation has on features specific to poetry, such as stanzaic form, lineation, and metrics.&amp;nbsp; Unlike Gregory, Diepreveen argues that "quoting poems" are quintessentially American, "coming partly from preoccupations with antecedents (Eliot and Pound) and with authenticity (Moore, Cummings, Eliot, and Pound)."&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Studying American modernist quoting poems illuminates other concepts crucial to modernism, like fragmentation, difficulty, and impersonality.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Diepreveen also looks at quotation as a destabilization of lyric voice that leads to the strands of postmodern art experimenting with ideas of dispersed subjectivity.&amp;nbsp; He argues, against Gregory, that quotations inevitably distort the subject of a poem, adducing the way that quotations continually redefine the subject of "The Octopus," Mt. Rainier.&amp;nbsp; He also reads Moore's famous statement about "Marriage" as an indicator that the poem falls under another genre, that of the anthology.&amp;nbsp; Anthologies pay for licenses, while Diepreveen claims that the modernists were content to steal, quoting Moore that a "good stealer is &lt;em&gt;ipso facto &lt;/em&gt;a good inventor."&amp;nbsp; Does copyright law leave room for theft that will "make it [poetry] new," to quote Pound?&amp;nbsp; Is modernism criminal?&amp;nbsp; Are the supposed effects that quotations have on poems the traces of this criminality?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
