<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/movies+bryher</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/movies+bryher</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/5412</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/5412</link>
<title>McCabe, Susan.  Cinematic modernism : modernist poetry and film</title>
<description>&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;Call#: Van Pelt Library PS310.M65 M37 2005&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;  &lt;p style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in" class="MsoNormal"&gt;McCabe, Susan. &lt;u&gt;Cinematic Modernism: Modernist Poetry and Film&lt;/u&gt;. Cambridge, UK; New  York: Cambridge UP, 2005.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt; McCabe touches on Pabst passim.  Of particular interest is her discussion of &amp;quot;H.D.'s unremitting admiration of Pabst--from &lt;em&gt;Joyless Street&lt;/em&gt; to having 'vanquished the border-sphere' in &lt;em&gt;Secrets of a Soul&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot; (162).   McCabe suggests that H.D. was attracted to Pabst's &amp;quot;feminine&amp;quot; film style which influenced her own film aesthetic.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/5018</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/5018</link>
<title>Friedberg, Anne.  Writing about Cinema: Close Up 1927-1933</title>
<description>&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;&amp;quot;Writing about Cinema: Close Up 1927-1933&amp;quot; &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline"&gt;Dissertation Abstracts International&lt;/span&gt;  [0419-4209] 44.12 (1984).  3522A-. [Request through ILL]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;Anne Friedberg argues for the importance of Close Up as an early film journal.  The journal's purpose was to &amp;quot;interrogate cinema's formal potential&amp;quot; in order to promote better films and filmmaking (325) .  Close up did not present one monolithic view of cinema but rather created a forum for debate about the &amp;quot;stylistic, technological, educational, and psychoanalytic potentials of the cinema&amp;quot; (328).  Friedberg also argues that as a periodical, Close Up circulated more easily than the films it covered, thus it &amp;quot;served as a more practical way to transmit theoretical ideas about cinema than did the viewing of films themselves&amp;quot; (325).  Friedberg includes chapters on Writing about Cinema; 'The Editorial Three'; POOL books and films; Close Up as international journal and salon; and the focal distance of reading. The very useful &amp;quot;Appendix III: A Chronology of Close Up in Context&amp;quot; is reprinted in the Close Up anthology edited by Donald, Friedberg, and Marcus [see entry in my Film and Psychoanalysis project].&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
</item>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/5086</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/project/5086</link>
<title>Film and Psychoanalysis</title>
<description/></item>
</channel>
</rss>
