<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/property+gifts</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/property+gifts</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/15134</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/voyager/15134</link>
<title>Gift : imagination and the erotic life of property / Lewis Hyde.</title>
<description>&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;Hyde, Lewis, 1945- .&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline"&gt;Gift : imagination and the erotic life of property / Lewis Hyde. &lt;/span&gt; [0394523016 : ] New York : Random House, 1983.  &lt;br /&gt;Call#: Van Pelt Library GN449.6 .H93 1983&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="mlacite"&gt;&amp;quot;A work of art seems to be a hardier breed; it can be sold in the market and still emerge a work of art. But if it is true that in the essential commerce of art a gift is carried by the work from the artist to his audience, if I am right to say that where there is no gift there is no art, then it may be possible to destroy a work of art by converting it into a pure commodity. I don't maintain that art can't be bought and sold, but that the gift portion of the work places a constraint upon our merchandising.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;quoted in the &lt;a href="../makerecord/url/14532"&gt;Ecstasy of Influence&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
