<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/santa_clara</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/santa_clara</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35744</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35744</link>
<title>FORA.tv - Counsel for Perfect 10 vs. Google Square Off</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt; Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt; &lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;
&lt;style&gt;
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-qformat:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin-top:0in;
	mso-para-margin-right:0in;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	mso-para-margin-left:0in;
	line-height:115%;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Andrew Bridges is the Google counsel on the board for this video and he brings up a couple very good points in favor of Google.&amp;nbsp; He points out one of Perfect 10's arguments, for the fourth factor of Fair Use, that Google's Image Search could severely hurt the market for a cell phone in the UK.&amp;nbsp; He pointed how ridiculous it would be if this large, very useful image search, could fail because of a single cell phone deal.&amp;nbsp; Clearly this shows that such an argument, from Perfect 10, should not be seriously considered.&amp;nbsp; He goes on to point out the Perfect 10 starts to combine trademark law with copyright law when they argue about framing.&amp;nbsp; He makes a very good case that the framing is very similar to hyperlinking, which is clearly not anywhere near copyright infringement.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Russ Frackman is the Perfect 10 counsel and brings up a potentially harmful argument against Google.&amp;nbsp; He argues that Google's linking is direct infringement because it links to copyrighted materials.&amp;nbsp; He cites a very good example of a South Park website that claims that it is not infringing because it is not hosting the video.&amp;nbsp; The video is imbedded on the page, but they do not actually host the video.&amp;nbsp; While this at first seems like a very strong argument, he fails to acknowledge the clear differences between Google and the South Park website.&amp;nbsp; Google Image Search is not directly linking to the website; rather a computer program is creating the thumbnails and the links.&amp;nbsp; The South Park website is purposefully linking to an infringing video.&amp;nbsp; He also points out that Google gains a lot by having their name on the screen in framing and the Image Search in general.&amp;nbsp; They are not merely providing a service.&amp;nbsp; While this is obviously true, it does not really hit the important issues.&amp;nbsp; Obviously the Image Search is important and beneficial to Google; if it was not, they would not have it.&amp;nbsp; It does not, in any way, contribute to the creation or even the linking to the infringing images.&amp;nbsp; For that reason alone, that aspect should not hold much importance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
