<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/tastemakers+fairuse</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/tastemakers+fairuse</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35814</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/35814</link>
<title>Listen. And learn. - The Boston Globe</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Written by correspondent Siddhartha Mitter, this article defines what an audio blogger actually is.&amp;nbsp; Mitter makes a claim that these MP3 bloggers are tastemakers--influencing their audience about what is good and what is not.&amp;nbsp; An important point is that audio bloggers don't just post an MP3 file, they also provide commentary, "a whimsical capsule review, with sound attached," he calls it.&amp;nbsp; He defines audio bloggers as unpaid obsessive music geeks who have capitalized on this generation's "sense of immediacy" about everything culture related.&amp;nbsp; He&amp;nbsp; acknowledges that bloggers have become the tastemaking elite, able to take acts such as Diplo from "obscurity to sensation" because of the 'buzz' these bloggere build.&amp;nbsp; Also mentioned briefly is a vague allusion to an unwritten Bloggers' Code of Conduct', in reference to how long a song is allowed to remain an downloadable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This article raises several different issues pertinent to my topic.&amp;nbsp; First, it underscores the importance of the 'non-commercial' status of blogs in regards to their legality.&amp;nbsp; Second, it reaffirms the ideas that bloggers are the dictators of what is deemed "cool" as opposed to the industry public relation firms, music magazines, MTV (old media).&amp;nbsp; Perhaps most importantly, it parallels the mp3 blog and the book review.&amp;nbsp; An MP3 blog is contingent upon the fact that along with the MP3 posted, there is some sort of commentary to go along with it.&amp;nbsp; To me, this raises the question of Fair Use.&amp;nbsp; Obviously, book reviews are allowed to print excerpts of the book in their critiques, and the courts have ruled this as a transformative version of the original work.&amp;nbsp; My insinuation, is that MP3 blogs could fall under the same statute.&amp;nbsp; Does the fact the song is being being critiqued force the MP3 blog under the Fair Use Defense by creating a transformative work?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
