http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/transportation_policy+inquirer+pennsylvania PennTags Feed http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/17331 http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/17331 Roads not taken in funding SEPTA?<br />The state leaves it little leeway for a local, dedicated source of revenue.<br />By Paul Nussbaum<br />Inquirer Staff Writer<br />When Pennsylvania legislators complain that SEPTA already gets more state funding and less local funding than most transit agencies in the United States, they're right.<p>But whose fault is that?</p><p>In Pennsylvania, the state prevents regional transit agencies and local governments from raising money in many of the ways used by their counterparts elsewhere.</p><p>Colorado and Georgia provide none of the money to operate Denver's and Atlanta's mass transit. Instead, they authorize local sales taxes, approved by local voters. New York, Michigan, Illinois and Ohio are among the states where local property taxes are earmarked for mass transit. Los Angeles County uses a 1 percent sales tax, approved by county voters.</p><p>Thirty-three states have authorized local or regional sales taxes specifically for transportation.</p><p>Not Pennsylvania.</p><br />