<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/tag/urban_studies+law</link>
<title>PennTags Feed for /tag/urban_studies+law</title>
<description>PennTags Feed</description>
<item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/7006</guid>
<link>http://tags.library.upenn.edu/makerecord/url/7006</link>
<title>Philadelphia Inquirer | 06/13/2006 | A 'consensus' eminent-domain plan in N.J.</title>
<description>A 'consensus' eminent-domain plan in N.J.&lt;br /&gt;Critics said the compromise proposal would not go far enough to curtail abuse. Builders and municipalities lauded the bill, which a sponsor expects will pass.&lt;br /&gt;By Elisa Ung&lt;br /&gt;Inquirer Trenton Bureau&lt;br /&gt;TRENTON - After a four-month review of how the most densely populated state allows the seizure of land for private redevelopment, key Democratic lawmakers are working on legislation that would tighten the criteria for exercising eminent domain and require more public notification.&amp;nbsp; Builders and the New Jersey State League of Municipalities cheered the proposal, while property owners, Republicans, and the state's public advocate said it did not go far enough to curb eminent-domain abuse.&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;The real question is: What will this do to stop the abuse taking place now? And the answer is: Nothing,&amp;quot; said Bill Potter, a Princeton lawyer who heads the Coalition Against Eminent Domain Abuse.&amp;nbsp; ...&lt;br /&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
