avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags
Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?
Gordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, Gunn E Vist, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Holger J Schünemann, for the GRADE Working Group
BMJB 2008;336:995-998, doi:10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE
tagged ebm evidence_based_practice by seymoura ...on 03-MAY-08

A systematic review identifies an intervention for a specific disease or other problem in health care, and determines whether or not this intervention works. To do this authors locate, appraise and synthesize evidence from as many relevant scientific studies as possible. They summarize conclusions about effectiveness, and provide a unique collation of the known evidence on a given topic, so that others can easily review the primary studies for any intervention.

Systematic reviews differ from other types of review in that they adhere to a strict design in order to make them more comprehensive, thus minimizing the chance of bias, and ensuring their reliability. Rather than reflecting the views of the authors, or being based on a partial selection of the literature, (as is the case with many articles and reviews that are not explicitly systematic), they contain all known references to trials on a particular intervention and a comprehensive summary of the available evidence. The reviews are therefore also valuable sources of information for those receiving care, as well as for decision makers and researchers.

tagged EBM database evidenced_based_medicine medicine reference by mcedrone ...on 17-AUG-06
Uni. of Wiconsin's EBM interface.
tagged EBM MLA by mcedrone ...on 26-MAY-06