avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags

Michael Cornfield's Commentary summarizes the ways in which the internet has become an essential medium of American politics. Cornfield outlines five major innovations of the Howard Dean (Joe Trippi, manager) 2004 campaign: news-pegged fundraising appeals, net-organized local gatherings, blogging, online referenda, decentralized decision-making. Cornfield examines the different Deanian techniques that Kerry and Bush utilized in their campaigns - Kerry focused more on fund-raising while Bush concentrated on grass-roots mobilization. Cornfield ultimately concludes that the Democrats started too late and were not effectively organized.


In an effort to analyze the techniques utilized by the emerging 2008 candidates, this article is useful for historicizing Internet politicking. One of the most interesting comments is Cornfield's re-imagining the concept of an "activist" - who might soon include "people who do little more than what ten minutes a month at their computers enable them to do." Although Moveon.org got 500,000 people to sign the petition against impeaching President Clinton, the House ultimately voted for impeachment. The organization's real power seems to have come from fund-raising for candidates. Is online activism now (say online petitions or virtual marches) as effective (in terms of real-world effects in policy, etc.) as live-action grassroots efforts - or could it be in the future?

This article (as its title indicates) is focused on the internet aspect of the 2004 campaign and does not offer a well-rounded examination of other campaign factors.


 

I'm researching the evolving role of the internet in politics, specifically in the last presidential elections (focusing on moveon.org and Howard Dean's campaign) up to the present efforts of some of the 2008 hopefuls. As I continue to research contemporary online strategies, John Edwards has become a particularly interesting example of the web-saavy candidate. Ultimately, I'm looking at the increasingly complex nature of internet politicking and the growing population of campaign internet users to make some observations about the future role of the internet in (campaign) politics - looking forward to the 2008 election and beyond. Useful websites are: moveon.org and onecorps.com.
tagged English569 Howard_Dean politics moveon internet elections John_Edwards by rachel ...on 12-MAR-07
Trippi, Joe. .
Revolution will not be televised : democracy, the Internet, and the overthrow of everything / Joe Trippi. [0060761555 (acid-free paper) ] New York : ReganBooks, c2004.
Call#: Van Pelt Library JK1764 .T75 2004
This is a really compelling, if somewhat repetitive account, of Joe Trippi's involvement in politics in general and the Howard Dean campaign in particular. This is one of the most forward-looking accounts I've read of the increasing role of the internet in American life, also offering strategies for current and future candidates, businesses, etc. to stay afloat in the online era.
 
However, I have difficulty fully swallowing Trippi's arguments about how Dean ultimately failed as a candidate. Trippi blames the steam-rolling political machine with its usual smear tactics and ability to lose interest in an unconventional candidate as quickly as it initially embraced him. Throughout the text, Trippi argues that the campaign itself, a campaign created by and for the people, remains a successful model, but he doesn't quite attend to the organizational pitfalls of such a movement. This leads me back to the question Cornfield and others raise: how do you encourage/harness the momentum of a movement within the boundaries of a campaign that ultimately must be organized in order to be effective?