avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags
Benjamin, Walter . Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Fine Arts Library Reserve Pamphlet - Kavky

This famous Benjamin essay gives a theoretical framework for which to view appropriation and reproduction. He comments on appropriation, ritual, theft, and the loss of aura. The author discusses how art became more accessible as the hand was freed by mechanical reproduction. Even though millennial reproduction technologies were not available when Benjamin wrote this essay, his arguments are still useful. He says, "Every day the urge grows stronger to get hold of an object at very close range by way of its likeness, its reproduction." He continues by discussing how the the spell of personality, but not aura, is present in films. The latter shows how the original and reproduction are two very different things. This essay gives one man's opinion about what art is in the 1930s, and further, makes us question what art is today. By showing that copyright questions of the past are still valid today, one is forced to confront issues of what it means to use other people's images in works of art. This essay is important for my paper because it postulates questions about ownership and reproduction that are driving factors behind my thesis.

Simon, Richard Keller. "Between Capra and Adorno: West's Day of the Locust and movies of the 1930s." Modern Language Quarterly. Vol. 54 Issue 4 (Dec. 1993). EBSCO MegaFILE. 9 Apr. 2008. <http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2055/ehost/detail?vid=11&hid=117&sid=a84a42de-5c72-4186-8e63-be5141727d64%40sessionmgr102>.

 

            This article traces the method Nathaniel West utilized in the creation of his novel The Day of the Locust.  The author identifies West’s employment as a screenwriter as the birthplace of the method he utilized to write The Day of the Locust.  In order to produce marketable screenplays, West was forced to “rearrange conventional film material rather than invent anything new.”   He later used this method of montage to create his novel, as nearly every element borrows from Hollywood films of the time.  The majority of the story he owes to Capra’s Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, his characterization borrows from B movie cliché’s of the time and other characters and themes come from other contemporary movies.  However, West’s success came by not merely adding these elements together, but reworking each one as a parody that attacked what West saw as Hollywood fantasy.  Further, West took revenge on the limiting Production code of the time by including scenes that could never appear on the screen, namely the cockfight and visits to a whorehouse.   While some commentators of the time thought that real life should be more like the movies, West effectively makes the movies more like real life.   The latter part of the article examines contemporary philosophical schools of thought that may not have directly influenced West, but observed the same elements of mass culture West satirizes. 

            This article is fascinating as it provides strong evidence for all of its assertions.  It leaves no doubt that the main elements of the story of West’s novel are a subverted version of Capra’s Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, and it shows how West attacked what he saw as not only the artifice of the movies but their power as well.  This only further adds to the interesting concept of West using that which he satirizes as direct subject matter as he not only weaves a tale about Hollywood movies but also uses the movies themselves in the creation of story elements.  As West collects from contemporary films for the creation of his novel, his novel is likewise harvested for the creation of the film that bears its name.