avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


related to google+aap+authors_guild
1 + copyright
1 + fair_use
1 + google_library_project
view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags

Adler, Allan, et al.  “The Battle over Books: Authors and Publishers Take on the Google Print Library Project.”  The New York Public Library, New York.  17 Nov. 2005. 

 

            On November 17, 2005 WIRED magazine and the NYPL sponsored a discussion on the Google Print Library Project.  The panelists were Nick Taylor, representing the Authors Guild, David Drummond, representing Google, Lawrence Lessig, a Stanford Law professor specializing in copyright law, and Allan Adler, representing the Association for American Publishers (AAP).  The discussion was intended to flesh out the issues raised by Google’s project and to gain insight into the future of the digital indexing of books.  However, rather than elucidate the copyright issues inherent in this debate, this discussion illustrated that economic incentives are at the heart of the conflict between Google and its opponents.   

            The first to speak, Taylor, immediately alludes that the Authors Guild’s objection was routed in its lack of economic benefit from Google’s program.  He claims that Google’s actions represent, “a rogue version of eminent domain, only without the compensation that government routinely gives.”  Adler’s statements reveal a similar point-of-view in which the real threat Google poses is an economic one.  Adler declares that since Google is a for-profit company its use of copyrighted material is essentially robbing copyright owners of the ability to exploit the market for their works. 

            Through this discussion it becomes apparent that the Authors Guild and the AAP believe that Google has created a new market for their works.  In addition, they believe that Google’s program will have a negative effect on their ability to access this new market.  Thus, a finding of fair use seems inappropriate to the Authors Guild and the AAP as in their view the fourth factor, effect on the market, should weigh against Google.  However, in the course of this discussion, both the Authors Guild and the AAP failed to show how Google Book Search impedes authors and publishers from licensing their work to search engines or anyone else.