avocets
Avocets
rss 2.0 subscribe to this page
search


view all
•  projects
•  owners
•  tags
Truffaut, FrancL'ois. . Hitchcock / by FrancL'ois Truffaut ; with the collaboration of Helen G. Scott. Rev. ed. 0671526014 series New York : Simon and Schuster, c1984.
Call#: Van Pelt Library PN1998.A3 H573 1984
 
        In Chapter 8 of this famous interview, Truffaut and Hitchcock focus their discussion on Notorious. Their conversation covers everything from the filmmaking process behind Notorious, the movie itself with the meaning and symbolism contained in the film, and its relevance after its release, both in Hitchcock's life and to international film audiences.
        This chapter is crucial to understanding the movie for several reasons. First, Hitchcock talks firsthand about the process he and Ben Hecht went through in making the film, mentioning the story that the film is loosely based on, and then going through the trial and error process to find the perfect MacGuffin (i.e., the the reason for the plot's action) and having the whole project sold to RKO after failing to convince producers of its potential for success. Hitchcock also discusses the historical relevance of the uranium used as the MacGuffin and its connections to the secret experiements taking place in New Mexico that eventually resulted in the creation of the atom bomb. In many respects, Hitchcock's real-life experiences creating the film were filled with some of the themes that made the film so compelling - government secrets (the Manhattan Project) and spying (Hitchcock claimed he was followed by the FBI as a result of his inquiries about uranium).
        Truffaut's opinions presented in the interview and Hitchcock's reactions are also of great importance in understanding how the film fits into Hitchcock's body of work. Truffaut describes Notorious as "the very quintessence of Hitchcock," and Hitchcock does not disagree. Yet the two also discuss how the film is at the same time atypical, having much less violence than most spy movies, villains who the audience can sympathize with on a certain level, and a very unexpected marriage proposal between the spy and the object of her espionage.

Truffaut introduces his compilation of a series of interview with Hitchcock with an anecdote in which he silences a critic of Rear Window who claimed he couldn't see Rear Window's flaws because he was not from New York City. Truffaut responded by saying "Rear Window is not about Greenwich Village, it is a film about cinema, and I do know cinema."

This anecdote applies to Lifeboat and author Steinbeck's dislike of the final material. He criticized the fallacy of things like one man rowing the whole lifeboat, failing to acknowledge the cinematic and symbolic implications this has for Willy's percieved control over the other suvivors.

In the interview, Hitchcock says Lifeboat was an effort to test his theory that psycological films contained mostly close-ups or two/three-shots. He saught to find an environment that would force a director to shoot mostly those shots.  This close-up style was later adopted by television, mainly due to the smaller screen size and not the psycological implications.

Hitchcock also here discusses his version of the allegory. He confrims that it is soley about the war (contradicting statements made by the producer). Kovac represented the communist way of dealing with the Nazis. He was the most vocal opponent to the captain, much in the same way early American Anti-Nazi Leagues had strong communist ties. Rittenhouse symbolized the Facist who is eager to give up control of the ship in a tumultous time to a dictator, much in the same way certain parts of society were, including the wealthy, eager to keep the status quo, and saw a dictator Roosevelt as their best hope.